A Kitchen Remodel: Choosing the Fridge
The past few months, I’ve been acting as the “consulting designer / installer” for a friend’s new Ikea kitchen. It was an interesting exercise to watch myself trade off energy efficiency considerations with aesthetic and design issues. For example: would I opt for the sexy side-by-side fridge with built-in ice & water dispenser and digital controls that my friend was swooning over? Or the simple, but energy efficient top freezer model with no bells and whistles?

Turns out that I ended up recommending the sexy side-by-side model, even though I knew that simpler top or bottom freezer models generally have better energy efficiency. How I ended up with this choice is an interesting example of why “rules of thumb” are helpful guides, but in the end, you have to look at each situation on its own merits.
Our first consideration was the big sale Ikea was having on appliances. Their price points alone would force us to give them serious consideration. Secondly, for aesthetic reasons, I knew that a counter-depth fridge (versus a standard free-standing model) would give the kitchen a much more professional look, since the fridge would be flush with the cabinets. But it turns out that Ikea has only one counter-depth fridge, and it is a side-by-side model with all the sexy trimmings.
So I ran the numbers. The “Nutid” counter-depth side-by-side fridge (love those Ikea product names) has an estimated annual energy cost of $59. This compares to an annual cost of about $50 for Ikea’s similarly sized (25 cubic feet) bottom freezer model without ice/water dispenser. Both are Energy Star qualified.
I ran a little spreadsheet to see how these two models compared against the energy costs for a “typical” 25 cubic foot Energy Star fridge:
- Average Energy Star side-by-side model: $63/year
- Average Energy Star bottom freezer model: $55/year (the largest Energy Star top freezer model is only 22 cubic feet).
While the rule-of-thumb was correct, the actual energy costs of the specific side-by-side model we were looking at was only $4 more per year than the typical Energy Star bottom freezer, and only $9 more than Ikea’s bottom freezer model. That was close enough for me to feel good recommending the “sexy” side-by-side, on both aesthetic and energy efficiency grounds, despite what my thumb had to say.


